3 ms·

There is no 'centralization of power' labeling slippery slope as a fallacy. It's a fallacy because it's a non-argument, it can be applied to anywhere at any tim

There is no 'centralization of power' labeling slippery slope as a fallacy. It's a fallacy because it's a non-argument, it can be applied to anywhere at any time and does nothing to actually prove your point. You're essentially arguing for the status quo, that nothing should ever change because otherwise you immediately slide down a slippery slope.

jakeogh 8y ago
"that nothing should ever change because otherwise you immediately slide down a slippery slope." Incorrect. I am explicitly arguing that restrictions are imposed incrementally. People are not going ignore a obvious direction (more rules not less). Purporting to have caught someone in a logical contradiction because they can use a compass is ignoring the fact that rules are countable. You are for prior restraint here, why not implement it in future body mods? Prior restraint _is_ to centralize power.