No, they're acting as a property owner saying "get this shit off my lawn, we didn't ask for you to have your fight here". Once again, the freedom of speech doe

No, they're acting as a property owner saying "get this shit off my lawn, we didn't ask for you to have your fight here". Once again, the freedom of speech does not give you the right to abuse other people's freedom to control their own property. Amazon's servers are their property, why do they have to let their brand image go down in the mind of people who are anti-Wikileaks?