2 ms·
No, but perhaps your refutation should be something that is a bit more in-depth than "you don't need to have sexual intimacy in your life to be happy and feel f
by enraged_camel 8y ago
No, but perhaps your refutation should be something that is a bit more in-depth than "you don't need to have sexual intimacy in your life to be happy and feel fulfilled."
- sridca 8y ago> your refutation See my comments on the distinction between need vs desire in this thread. > should be something that is a bit more in-depth than "you don't need to have sexual intimacy in your life to be happy That's correct. You can feel happy doing a variety of things, such as hobbies, work, dining out with friends, etc. Your not engaging in sexual intercourse does automagically stop happiness in tracks. > ... and feel fulfilled." Nothing in the dictionary definition of the word "fulfilled" -- "satisfied or happy because of fully developing one's abilities or character." -- indicates necessarily having sexual intercourse.