3 ms·
What a horrible idea unless you're an extraverted person who'd be likely to join the events anyway.
by yason 8y ago
What a horrible idea unless you're an extraverted person who'd be likely to join the events anyway.
- abledon 8y ago‘What a horrible idea — interacting with other humans face to face - I’d be so uncomfortable’. I see it as a weak social muscle that hasn’t had a lot of workout time and is leaning on a crutch of modern lifestyle staying indoors on screen time. Just like how gradual exercise will make someone stronger , lose weight and take a burden off of the public healthcare system — social exercise will benefit society as well instead of infantalizing and nurturing a generation of socially crippled human beings lol. As for the extroverted person , maybe they only go to bars to pickup people for quick lays, they don’t contribute to community like helping build a house or work on community plots of land or help paint a mural etc , it could balance it out
- baroffoos 8y agoMandatory bullshit events forced on people who don't want to be there and then likely some stupid process to prove to the government that you attended the event is a horrible idea. If you want to encourage face to face events then you need to transform urban spaces to be more walkable and create more public spaces people actually want to hang out at. If I go outside I could walk around for hours and the only people I would see are out there for fitness and do not wish to be disturbed by random chats. Forcing people to do things is never as effective as making people want to do them in the first place.
- abledon 8y agoI think having 50 people meet up at a community center to go volunteer is way more feasible than redesigning urban infrastructure. I agree forcing is not nice but tell that to all the children who don’t want to go to school haha
- AnIdiotOnTheNet 8y agoI'm not sure that's true. If you look at where people meet their spouses you often find it was in school or at work (at least here in the states), basically places where they were forced to interact with other people.
- michaelmrose 8y agoNobody wants to erect a massive social infrastructure that diminishes their enjoyment of their time to improve YOUR enjoyment of society. In fact nobody on planet earth wants to be subjected to what YOU or any other person believes they ought to do with their money/time without pay. Can you imagine how your friends would feel if you stole from their wallet to plan a party and told them you would steal some more if they didn't come? Is their a particular reason you aren't suggesting organizing more events say in your locality and encouraging rather than forcing people to join?
- abledon 8y agoDude chill out lol , no one is talking about massive social infrastructure — get a dozen people together in front of some old abandoned land and build something cool. Maybe even just a landscape project with recycled materials from around the worksite. I’m just riffing here on ways to improve society — people may not like doing something but if it’s good for them maybe we should incentivize it . If it’s a party that had cake which cured a bad recurring disease that I’m too lazy and stubborn to fix then I’d be grateful for those friends I am doing the above, I do encourage people and really it’s not high on my priority list — it’s just a suggestion about how we could remedy a gaping problem in our modern social fabric
- michaelmrose 8y agoOnce again nobody wants you to take money out of their pockets to fund parties and give them a little of it back if they attend. People not doing what you expect them to isn't a gaping problem in modern society.