4 ms·

> Microsoft's control was superficial, and that's how they like it. They don't want to control what you put on your computer, they just want you to pay them the

• lukeschlather 16y ago
  It has nothing to do with Microsoft's stagnation. I've lived the past decade, and I'd rather be forced to use a mildly overpriced platform where I can run any code I want than a [wm]ildly overpriced platform where the code I can use is dictated by people who have a political agenda, and flat out refuse to let me run what code I want on the property I've ostensibly purchased.
  • berntb 16y ago
    Don't use any phone based architecture to run code, then. They were tightly controlled before Apple. Compare a Mac with windows, instead.
    • recoiledsnake 16y ago
      Err. what's wrong with comparing iOS and Android?
      • berntb 16y ago
        I commented on something discussing Microsoft. I didn't know MSoft did Android phones (yet)...
  • napierzaza 16y ago
    Microsoft killed off all sorts of competitors using their sales channel with suppliers and other pressure tactics. You don't know what you're missing because it never happened. I wish people would stop saying that Bill Gates has always been a nice guy because he's retired and giving away his money. Don't fool yourself into thinking that MS is more open, they don't have much of a mobile OS for you to compare with iOS anyways.
    • recoiledsnake 16y ago
      So you mean if OS X won instead of Windows, there would be more competitors, right? Nope, there would be even less, because Apple makes it's own hardware, it would have killed off a lot of hardware companies, AMD, ATI being big examples. And Apple is going to kill off so many hardware companies because if it wins like Windows, it's going to be the sole arbitrator of who gets to build hardware for it. All MS wanted was for you to pay the Windows tax. Apple wants to control the hardware as well. Eg. Windows Phone 7 is a OS that various OEMs can run on different devices. iOS is basically just firmware for Apple's devices.
      • gamble 16y ago
        BS. MS cared very, very much about what software you ran. Remember Netscape? Borland? Microsoft J++? They put pressure on OEMs not to ship Netscape that make anything Apple's done with iOS pale in comparison. It may be hard to appreciate today, but in the 90's you couldn't start a software company without a ready answer for how you were going to survive if MS decided they had to kill your product to protect the Windows monopoly.
        • farmerbuzz 16y ago
          There is a difference between competing in a business environment and limiting what your customers can do with your product. Although competition may indirectly determine what customers can do (by destroying businesses that may have created software they wanted) it is different from directly controlling what customers can do the way Apple does.
          • berntb 16y ago
            I really can't see a meaning with that comment. I don't think anyone claimed that Apple's e.g. censoring porn is the same kind as Microsoft murdering competition and slowing down development. For porn -- relax, much online video works on the iPad. :-) I would argue almost all areas is better with competition. If you prefer monopoly solutions, there is still North Korea (Cuba will go a bit capitalism, I've seen).