Given what I said, Even for fairly simple examples, it would still be more bug prone, simply due to humans not having perfect cognition. At scale that can add u

Given what I said, Even for fairly simple examples, it would still be more bug prone, simply due to humans not having perfect cognition. At scale that can add up. Also keep in mind that this both enables, and follows a trajectory of increasingly complex frontend applications, previously a lot of interactive stuff was done server side. Patently absurd, if you take it as a strawman, sure. You ended up using that to paint the complete opposite picture, which was essentially that Typescript doesn't actually add any real value, only "perceived" value. Which is true, if all you value is the execution environment. Keep in mind that Typescript was not the first attempt at trying to "tame" Javascript. One example that comes to mind is Coffeescript. The natural reducto ad absurdum is thus, well why aren't we just writing in ASM, it all boils down to that anyway, right? People were doing fine then too... Could it also be said that accusing people of needing "crutches" is also snobbery?