4 ms·

https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-github-2017-be98ab854e87 https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-gith... On these figur

https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-github-2017-be98ab854e87 https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-gith... On these figures, Amazon is behind other giants and has fewer contributions that a number of midsize tech companies like Red Hat or Pivotal (my employer).

cthalupa 8y ago
It looks like that's missing data - including some very big ones. https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker has quite a few stars and came out in 2018 - no mention. All three of them have contributed to the Linux kernel in significant fashions, and it's not listed for any of them, despite the 72k stars. And are github repos and stars the only way to measure open source contribution? The Xen project only has 162 stars, yet I don't think anyone would say it isn't an important project, and it's one Amazon has contributed to - if you're using a PV guest on Xen that's protected against Meltdown, chances are high you're using the Vixen mitigation that Amazon released. Could Amazon do more? Probably. I'm not trying to say they're perfect. But this idea that they don't contribute back to open source seems pretty flawed, even by the data in your link, which seems incomplete.
- jacques_chester 8y ago
  A lot of folks have complained about this data set, but the author has updated based on feedback. So it'll improve. But unless Amazon are hiding several hundred contributors and thousands of commits in a repo that's been magically overlooked for years, the figures tend to make them look bad.
googlemike 8y ago
This is missing so many repos, from so many companies. What a terrible source.
- jacques_chester 8y ago
  I don't disagree, but it's the source we have and the author appears open to correction.

4 ms·

https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-github-2017-be98ab854e87 https://medium.freecodecamp.org/the-top-contributors-to-gith... On these figur

by jacques_chester 8y ago

cthalupa 8y ago
It looks like that's missing data - including some very big ones. https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker https://github.com/firecracker-microvm/firecracker has quite a few stars and came out in 2018 - no mention. All three of them have contributed to the Linux kernel in significant fashions, and it's not listed for any of them, despite the 72k stars. And are github repos and stars the only way to measure open source contribution? The Xen project only has 162 stars, yet I don't think anyone would say it isn't an important project, and it's one Amazon has contributed to - if you're using a PV guest on Xen that's protected against Meltdown, chances are high you're using the Vixen mitigation that Amazon released. Could Amazon do more? Probably. I'm not trying to say they're perfect. But this idea that they don't contribute back to open source seems pretty flawed, even by the data in your link, which seems incomplete.
- jacques_chester 8y ago
  A lot of folks have complained about this data set, but the author has updated based on feedback. So it'll improve. But unless Amazon are hiding several hundred contributors and thousands of commits in a repo that's been magically overlooked for years, the figures tend to make them look bad.
googlemike 8y ago
This is missing so many repos, from so many companies. What a terrible source.
- jacques_chester 8y ago
  I don't disagree, but it's the source we have and the author appears open to correction.