4 ms·
I really wish Github charged by users and disk space only, and quit with the private repo count limit added on top of that. We wanted to use Github at the (sma
by Legion 16y ago
I really wish Github charged by users and disk space only, and quit with the private repo count limit added on top of that.
We wanted to use Github at the (small) company I work for, but we have tons of tiny, low-traffic repos. Since Github limits repo count, regardless of how low-resource they are, we flat out cannot use them, period.
Bitbucket has the right idea - number of repos is completely meaningless. Make it unlimited and charge only by meaningful metrics, like user count. Unfortunately, their shift to that plan came too late for us, as we put in the effort of self-hosting. Still, there's that special something Github has that Bitbucket lacks, and we would still consider migrating to Github if only they dropped the arbitrary repo count limit.
- abrudtkuhl 16y agoJust had that conversation... Everybody charges per repo and that's pointless. Charge for disk space and let us have unlimited repos. I would sign up for monthly plan then.
- storborg 16y agoGithub wants to price discriminate between serious users who can afford to pay more, and casual users. Projects with a high development budget (e.g. complex software projects) don't necessarily use more disk space than someone's personal website, so disk space isn't a good way of price discriminating. On the other hand, organizations with a high dev tool budget are probably more likely, on average, to have more private repos. So it's in Github's best interest to charge by repo count, until they figure out a better way of discriminating between customers.
- sunkencity 16y agoI'd like github to differentiate between private and public repos more, to make the private repo feel more secure. Now I have to look twice to make sure the repo is private. I would also like to have a way to say - this repo can NEVER be made public, and neither can forks.
- jules 16y agoCharging by users seems like the most obvious discriminator between casual and large budget, not number of repos.
- wwortiz 16y agoI for one would buy a micro plan if its only limit was 1 collaborator, but for now I will stick to bitbucket (kiln is free for 1 collaborator in case anyone didn't know through the student and startup edition).
- pbiggar 16y agoI asked Tom from github about this when I met him. Apparently they hear it a lot. He had two responses. The first was that they didn't want to commoditize their service, which they thought competing on disk space would do. The second is that they limiting private repos made people upgrade, and provided most of their revenue. I really don't like the response. git encourages a repo-per project, but github discourages it with their plans. This impedance mismatch means I don't use github for private hosting, only for open source projects, where there is no such mismatch.