3 ms·
It's certainly not as readable as the Haskell version, despite the claim to the contrary in the comments. But it's nice to see them supporting this style of pro
by willtim 8y ago
It's certainly not as readable as the Haskell version, despite the claim to the contrary in the comments. But it's nice to see them supporting this style of programming.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]
- EdwardDiego 8y agoSure, but for anyone with any familiarity with that style (I know it from Erlang), it's immediately clear what it does.