4 ms·
IMHO, for the "average" consumer, there's very little difference between the either the capabilities or the ease of use of either and Android phone or an iPhone
by theBobMcCormick 16y ago
IMHO, for the "average" consumer, there's very little difference between the either the capabilities or the ease of use of either and Android phone or an iPhone. It's almost Pepsi vs. Coke.
Hackability is completely off the average consumer's radar.
- piguy314 16y agoThat's because innovation is a positive externality, people don't consider innovation when they buy an electronic device, but their choices do have consequences (which of course is the definition of an externality). Econtalk did a great show about this and net neutrality: Relevant excerpt from show: What is worrisome--because the Apple iPad is not as open as the cloud? As the PC. That's a market response. That assumes the market response incorporates all externalities. It doesn't. Classic externality for the consumer to prefer the fantastic interface of the iPhone to the long-term innovation. You wouldn't anticipate consumers making buying decisions today incorporating the long-term value of a more innovative platform. No reason for them to do it. http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2010/04/benkler_on_net.html http://www.econtalk.org/archives/2010/04/benkler_on_net.html