2 ms·
Though it's the most amount of deaths by year currently, their argument generally is about if a nuclear plant close to population pops off. A single city would
by devwastaken 8y ago
Though it's the most amount of deaths by year currently, their argument generally is about if a nuclear plant close to population pops off. A single city would be 1000x what coals killed.
- YjSe2GMQ 8y agoIt would not. 1. The grandparent's source quotes the coal death rate of ~100k/PWh. 2. Global coal processing is at ~50 PWh/year: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_energy_consumption 3. This means ~5M people die to coal each year.
- tathougies 8y ago> Though it's the most amount of deaths by year currently, their argument generally is about if a nuclear plant close to population pops off. Then move the plant farther away?