4 ms·
Sure, but it’s not voluntary if it’s done fraudulently. Hypothetically, if the police or their agents were doing this and telling people it was a test for cance
by pmiller2 8y ago
Sure, but it’s not voluntary if it’s done fraudulently. Hypothetically, if the police or their agents were doing this and telling people it was a test for cancer, that might not hold up.
- dontbenebby 8y ago>Sure, but it’s not voluntary if it’s done fraudulently. The police are allowed to lie to you to get you to consent to a search. (The most common example is claiming they could search w/o consent but you agreeing makes it "easier")
- pmiller2 8y agoViolating the privacy of multiple non-suspects is a search? None of the people in the article seem to be under suspicion, yet their DNA is being collected under the pretense of a “cancer test.” Police can lie to suspects, but they don’t get to violate the rights of (presumed) innocent people.