4 ms·
> On one side is a country whose identity is defined by anti-India-nism. On the other side is China, need I say more Two incredibly low blows, although I suppo
by guitarbill 8y ago
> On one side is a country whose identity is defined by anti-India-nism. On the other side is China, need I say more
Two incredibly low blows, although I suppose this way you've made your isolated point of view very clear.
> Moreover, both these neighbors are ganged up by their mutual animosity of India.
Another way of saying this is they've been successful in maintaining strong ties via diplomacy and trade, to the benefit of their peoples.
> India doesn't have any options but to make sure there are deterrents in place. It's a necessity.
There have always been options; some of which India has rejected themselves, arguably leading to the souring of other international relations. This weapons test will hopefully lead to condemnations and repercussions, direct or indirect.
For example, I would welcome the IRSO being excluded from further policy-making as part of the Inter-Agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC).
- BurningFrog 8y agoCalling China "China" is an incredibly low blow?
- glennpratt 8y agoYou ignored the rest of the sentence.
- vlehto 8y ago>Another way of saying this is they've been successful in maintaining strong ties via diplomacy and trade, to the benefit of their peoples. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–Pakistan_relations#Military_relations https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/China–Pakistan_relations#Milit...
- sbmthakur 8y ago> Another way of saying this is they've been successful in maintaining strong ties via diplomacy and trade, to the benefit of their peoples. How is it strong trade ties when one country owes billions of dollars to other? https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/pakistan-owe-china-gwadar-port-usd-10-billion-debt-1479562-2019-03-16 https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/pakistan-owe-china-gwa...
- cscurmudgeon 8y agoIf India is rejected so should US, Russia and China.