2 ms·
> I am not dismissing them ... I acknowledged as much. I mistakenly didn't see you as asking "how it is rational" but as asking "how could it be considered rat
by sonusario 8y ago
> I am not dismissing them ...
I acknowledged as much. I mistakenly didn't see you as asking "how it is rational" but as asking "how could it be considered rational?". This is why I hadn't answered your question and instead chose to note that such events haven't been proven impossible.
> So ... how is it rational to believe that either of those Christian doctrines is true?
There is historical evidence for those events occurring, and there are hardly any counter claims that amount to more than just speculation.
- zAy0LfpBZLC8mAC 8y agoIf that same kind of evidence were presented to you about a figure in a different religion, would you agree that that figure also was born to a virgin or came back from death? What if the same kind of evidence were presented about some other person, not related to a religion? Would you agree that that person was born to a virgin or came back from death?
- sonusario 8y agoTo both questions: Assuming all the evidence has the same veracity, yes.