Well, in my defense, I never intended it as a counter. Like I explained, I was being flippant. I responded with nonsense to something that I originally perceive

Well, in my defense, I never intended it as a counter. Like I explained, I was being flippant. I responded with nonsense to something that I originally perceived as being nonsense. I can accept that I was wrong. And, absolutely, in retrospect, at the very least, it was all in bad taste. > The question is why the red shift happens, and the proposed answer is that the photons were actually emitted with less energy. I didn't get that from TFA or the GP question at all. What are you basing that on? What am I missing? A more careful reading?