> You sound like a typical religious fanatic who tends to deny the fa... FWIIW, I'm an atheist: overtly and publicly so, under my real name even. Not that this

> You sound like a typical religious fanatic who tends to deny the fa... FWIIW, I'm an atheist: overtly and publicly so, under my real name even. Not that this should matter; if I were a foaming religious looney handing out bibles on a street corner; everything I said is still a historical fact. Since we're psychoanalyzing each other; I used to be a smug Dawkins tier ignoramous myself; I grew up, noticed most of the physicists at LBNL who were worth two shits were religious and read a book or two. Your apparent bigotry against religious people is offensive and stupid, and your understanding of the history of science, or even what science actually is, is sorely lacking. >You're bringing many names and points, writing paragraphs here, but you are yet to quote a single source... > ... on the definite lack of attention to punctuation... Projection is a hell of a drug.