3 ms·
The implication being that all those companies were cooperating and not being inadvertently tapped. This is not a given and from what I've seen the later seemed
by estebank 8y ago
The implication being that all those companies were cooperating and not being inadvertently tapped. This is not a given and from what I've seen the later seemed more likely, without discounting the existence of companies that do cooperate on an ongoing basis.
- cheez 8y agoThe documents identified several technology companies as participants in the PRISM program
- willstrafach 8y ago> participants To avoid giving the wrong impression to folks, it is worth noting that ‘participating’ means they produced requested communications on an ongoing basis pursuant to orders from a judge.
- cheez 8y agoThank you for clarifying. To clarify further, this is the FISA (secret) court that Will is referring to that also ended up rubber stamping surveillance of a political campaign.