That form is useful information. It states: > Neither the 120 qualifying payments nor employment have to be consecutive. Do you know if any of the tens of th

That form is useful information. It states: > Neither the 120 qualifying payments nor employment have to be consecutive. Do you know if any of the tens of thousands rejected were rejected because they made a single late payment as some are claiming? The text on the form does not make that a disqualifier. It would seem to be important to clarify whether the form is incorrect as pertains to the law, or if none of the claims made are true that a single, or even a sequence of, late payments scuttled eligibility for someone.