Ok, now give your reply when the 'app' is critical to saving lives. Each hour it isn't available costs, let's say, 1 infant their life who could otherwise have

Ok, now give your reply when the 'app' is critical to saving lives. Each hour it isn't available costs, let's say, 1 infant their life who could otherwise have been saved, per 1000 app users. The point of the exercise being that you seem to be dismissing the fact that there are actual bad consequences to the 'must be 100% accessible upon first release' principle, simply because a person for whom accommodation is required now has a job. What I don't see in your argument is some sort of equitable discussion of who bears what costs, and how that equity is fairly determined.