4 ms·

Is there any potential risks to using an Airbnb host's “free home WiFi”

4 points by subroutine 8y ago

In the news recently, there has been a string of incidents where Airbnb hosts have setup hidden webcams in their home. In regard to these incidents someone on twitter remarked... AirBnB unpacking checklist: - locate home internet router - unplug it Several ensuing comments were in the vein of... "and lose the ability to connect to wifi on the off chance?!" This made me wonder about another potential security concern... how much personal info could a tech savvy/malicious host scrape from someone who simply connects to their router and uses the internet per typical use (check bank account, log into email, etc.)?

kobiguru 8y ago
Man in the middle attack is pretty easy to do if you have control over the traffic. So I would simply say stay off. But that's just being super paranoid.
- Ultramanoid 8y ago
  Is it though ? How is it different from trusting a café's or a hotel's free WiFi ?
  - subroutine 8y ago
    Naturally from a tech standpoint, not different. There is a meaningful tech-independent difference though, with regard to the motives of an individual vs. Starbucks/Hilton We trust Hilton wifi because there is some mutual understanding that if it were found out Hilton was installing hidden cameras in the bedrooms and accessing our personal information via wifi hacking, they'd suffer heavily (wrt. social media backlash, civil lawsuits, reduction in customers, compliance with new policy/oversight groups, etc.). Basically such a move would be detrimental to their bottom-line. Also these businesses are public spaces with a staff of employees who overlook each-other's work. I assume people are much less likely to implement some sneaky scheme like installing a hidden camera at their workplace rather than in the privacy of their own residence. Should I be more weary about connecting to the wifi at some local co-op jazz cafe vs. Starbucks is exactly what I'd like to know. Is a man-in-the-middle hack something a script-kid could easily pull off, or is there more to it?

4 points by subroutine 8y ago

kobiguru 8y ago

Man in the middle attack is pretty easy to do if you have control over the traffic. So I would simply say stay off. But that's just being super paranoid.

Ultramanoid 8y ago
Is it though ? How is it different from trusting a café's or a hotel's free WiFi ?
- subroutine 8y ago
  Naturally from a tech standpoint, not different. There is a meaningful tech-independent difference though, with regard to the motives of an individual vs. Starbucks/Hilton We trust Hilton wifi because there is some mutual understanding that if it were found out Hilton was installing hidden cameras in the bedrooms and accessing our personal information via wifi hacking, they'd suffer heavily (wrt. social media backlash, civil lawsuits, reduction in customers, compliance with new policy/oversight groups, etc.). Basically such a move would be detrimental to their bottom-line. Also these businesses are public spaces with a staff of employees who overlook each-other's work. I assume people are much less likely to implement some sneaky scheme like installing a hidden camera at their workplace rather than in the privacy of their own residence. Should I be more weary about connecting to the wifi at some local co-op jazz cafe vs. Starbucks is exactly what I'd like to know. Is a man-in-the-middle hack something a script-kid could easily pull off, or is there more to it?