That was my reading of it, but on second thought it’s almost perfectly ambiguous. There’s a certain glibness about it that fits better with the malevolent inte

That was my reading of it, but on second thought it’s almost perfectly ambiguous. There’s a certain glibness about it that fits better with the malevolent interpretation. Plus hoping for a fine to serve as an example seems just too obvious to merit writing it down? It’s almost a work of art. Or maybe a Rorschach test. Will the internet interpret your statements in the best or worst possible light?