>The layoffs are almost all lead by the retail sector, which is undergoing a shift due to digital disruption from the likes of Amazon. Except YoY retail layoff

>The layoffs are almost all lead by the retail sector, which is undergoing a shift due to digital disruption from the likes of Amazon. Except YoY retail layoffs have shrunk by 20%. And that's a very strange burden of proof to lay down for trickle down economics, considering that tax cuts for the wealthy are repeatedly claimed to generate jobs. Are you saying the job generation claim is a red herring? Would you equally defend me not paying any taxes since it "doesn't hurt anything", or do I need to be super-rich first to get the tax-cut apologizing?