> I question why that isn't the assumed position. :( I suspect that each paradigm alone is easier to innovate in, than assuming that each is developed sufficie

> I question why that isn't the assumed position. :( I suspect that each paradigm alone is easier to innovate in, than assuming that each is developed sufficiently to connect together. "Integrating technologies for benefit" is a common view for intellectuals or business-people outside of a discipline who only know enough to see every key-worded algorithm or technology as a black box. Researchers in a field, that need to make a career for themselves by choosing problems tractable and filled with smaller parts, would see difficulties as to how and why that might be inappropriate at a given time.