2 ms·
Fair enough. I'm used to union arrangements where membership is required for the given profession, which is pretty common in the US. There's been a movement to
by r_smart 8y ago
Fair enough. I'm used to union arrangements where membership is required for the given profession, which is pretty common in the US.
There's been a movement to right to work, but even then, the non-union employees are forced to abide by the union negotiated contract, which is bullshit.
- vkou 8y ago> There's been a movement to right to work By which you mean, there's been a movement by employers towards the right to work for less. > but even then, the non-union employees are forced to abide by the union negotiated contract, which is bullshit. What's bullshit is that non-union employees get the same benefits that a union fought for, without having to do any work to get them.
- r_smart 8y ago|By which you mean, there's been a movement by employers towards the right to work for less. Unions can keep people out of professions in a lot of places in the US. Right to work makes it so union membership isn't mandatory. Surely if the union is so awesome, voluntary membership would work just fine. |What's bullshit is that non-union employees get the same benefits that a union fought for, without having to do any work to get them. Take it up with the union leadership, not me pal. They're the ones agitating for this stuff.