> 2) that they do not want to give this issue publicity. Well, that worked quite well. I'd think that, as a rule, you can't rely on rejection as a mechanism f

> 2) that they do not want to give this issue publicity. Well, that worked quite well. I'd think that, as a rule, you can't rely on rejection as a mechanism for preventing something from getting publicity. Someone savvy can use that as a fuel for publicity. You'd have to destroy both the message and the messenger.. and also any onlookers.