2 ms·
The term "LAMP stack" is at least 15 years old and even RMS commented on it a long time ago. That's as mainstream as it gets.
by nukeop 8y ago
The term "LAMP stack" is at least 15 years old and even RMS commented on it a long time ago. That's as mainstream as it gets.
- octo_t 8y agoIn what world do you live in where RMS is a mainstream figure? Or LAMP stack is a mainstream term?
- philipov 8y agoThat's like saying differential equations aren't mainstream just because not everyone takes university-level math. Stacks are a mainstream technical concept in a mainstream technical profession. The relevant domain for determining prevalence is "Programmers." Non-technical people don't count.
- ergothus 8y agoI'd actually say the relevant group is "people trying to understand the domain" (given the question in the headline). Which, generally, boils down to a group that is largely programmers, and even those that aren't programmers DO (AFAICT) have familiarity with the "stack" concept (non-technical Eng Managers, non-technical PMs, etc) I'm not saying you're wrong in any way, just pointing out that it can be said in a way that doesn't sound like "programmers are all that matter" (which I don't think was your intent anyway).
- tellak 8y agoHeh maybe you’re too young? LAMP stack is probably at this point so old nobody cares. But having worked with decisionmakers in corporations with large IT needs most were quite aware of LAMP-I mean it was in many ways the killer app of Linux. Also this notion that stack was invented in tech is ridiculous. Stack ups have been referred to in manufacturing and medicine for years prior.
- syrrim 8y ago"Mainstream" as in outside of technology circles.