> I agree with this. Having a private corporation that's invested in engagement, which is also headquartered in the US (very far geographically and culturally f

> I agree with this. Having a private corporation that's invested in engagement, which is also headquartered in the US (very far geographically and culturally from some of the places it moderates) be in charge of defining what's right and what's wrong, is and has been a recipe for disaster— let alone the implications it could have around the sovereignty of nations. What? If Facebook decides it, it's a threat to sovereignity of countries other then the US, but if the USG decides it, it isn't?