> but in the US justice system considering this secondary behavior is perfectly legal Out of interest, do you know if that's a fact in the Ulbricht case i.e. t

> but in the US justice system considering this secondary behavior is perfectly legal Out of interest, do you know if that's a fact in the Ulbricht case i.e. the judge said she was taking it into account? I'm not sure it matters hugely in the sense that the mandatory minimum for Continuing Criminal Enterprise is life and he was well within the bounds of that. Just curious.