This is a poor example because it draws a comparison on what most would consider an invasion on a person's basic rights. I'm aware that public facing figures ha

This is a poor example because it draws a comparison on what most would consider an invasion on a person's basic rights. I'm aware that public facing figures have to maintain an image but a hair transplant is more invasive than basic grooming. A better comparison would be that the shareholders wanted it so that Beezos had to wear a well designed Amazon logo branded tie during business vs. whatever he wears. That example is far less invasive of personal rights and insignificant to the business operations. Most would agree it would be silly to waste time and effort worrying about Beezo's work tie design... Or, keeping in line with the original example, that Beezos had to wear an Amazon hat/cap during business work.