A publicly traded company should act in the interest of its shareholders. If a large portion of those shareholders hold certain moral standards that they value

A publicly traded company should act in the interest of its shareholders. If a large portion of those shareholders hold certain moral standards that they value higher than money, shouldn't the company be held to those standards? If people felt that strongly about a CEO's haircut, maybe it should be up for debate too, but it's a terrible comparison since it wouldn't affect society at large the way that large-scale surveillance does.