5 ms·
This closely mirrors my own thesis on genius. There are first level, direct thinkers. This is the lower 50% of all people, although everyone is capable of it.
by aphextron 8y ago
This closely mirrors my own thesis on genius.
There are first level, direct thinkers. This is the lower 50% of all people, although everyone is capable of it. It is direct and without irony, sarcasm, or self reflection. Think slapstick comedy, or superhero movies.
The second level is in 4th wall breaking, analogy, simile, anything which takes "getting" the joke beyond the purely visual. Most people who consider themselves "smart" fall here. About the 50th to 90th percentile of intelligence/creativity.
Third level is hard to describe with words by it's nature. It's all about indirection. Not making an analogy, but taking the analogy for granted and riffing off of that. Most truly genius artists, comedians, musicians, scientists, etc. live at this level. Think the comedy of someone like Dave Chappelle, the music of Bob Dylan, or scientists like Stephen Hawking.
The fourth level is unattainable for humans as a constant state. The very best third level people can just barely get glimpses of it, and bring those glimpses back down for us to see. These are our all time great works of art, and generational scientific breakthroughs. Picasso, Bach, and Einstein are the archetypes here. But what we (the second level masses) are able to see is just a projection, like a 3 dimensional representation of a 4 dimensional shape. The effect is still mind-blowing, but unless you're at that 3rd level it's impossible to really conceive its' true nature. Genius is in the ability to translate those brief fleeting glimpses of the 4th level by a 3rd level person into something intelligible by the 2nd and 1st.
- disqard 8y agoYou should check out the concept of the "SOLO Hierarchy" by Raymond Lister.
- goatlover 8y ago> It is direct and without irony, sarcasm, or self reflection. Think slapstick comedy, or superhero movies. RDJ/Tony Stark would like a word with you.
- coldtea 8y agoIrony, sarcasm, and self reflection at the context of the movie, not the character. RDJ/Tony Stark's "Irony, sarcasm, and self reflection" are still a flat description of an ironic, sarcastic etc character. Not irony, sarcasm etc superimposed on the design/presence of the character itself within the movie.
- degenerate 8y agoMost modern superhero movies are indeed first level, bottom-of-the-barrel content: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vfqkvwW2fs https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vfqkvwW2fs
- xenihn 8y ago1st Level - Rick & Morty 2nd Level - Bojack Horseman 3rd Level - Moral Orel 4th Level - Xavier: Renegade Angel
- pferde 8y agoMy favourite way of illustrating the difference between 1st order and 2nd order thinking is actually a quote by Frederik Pohl: "A good science fiction story should be able to predict not the automobile but the traffic jam."
- DontGiveTwoFlux 8y agoA cleric in 1200 might have said that the masses could never read, and that illiteracy will always be a feature of our society and that it is natural. Yet, here we are today, all reading. Maybe Einstein’s talents can really elude nearly everyone, but don’t short change your fellow human. If you do, you will be all the worse off for it.