3 ms·
That would be an astronomical loss, I just don't see that happening.
by peteradio 8y ago
That would be an astronomical loss, I just don't see that happening.
- zaroth 8y agoI think $3B in R&D, half of that is the engines, but more importantly, time to market trying to compete with Airbus. They can reuse the engines. If the airframe can’t fly safely without MCAS (it’s getting a new type rating anyway at this point, right?) then I think perhaps it shouldn’t fly.
- peteradio 8y agoYea somehow I don't think that's how they are crunching the numbers. Stock price is probably sitting on the assumption that those 5000 orders at cool 128M are going to go through. That would be considered 600B loss.
- mnm1 8y agoThat's two billion roughly per life lost. Seems like a small price to pay. The CEO should be going to jail too. I highly doubt any of this will happen. Human lives are probably worth a million or two at most to a corporation like Boeing and the political apparatus that lets it operate these planes.
- jayalpha 8y agoIn the end, not the FAA but the consumer may decide this. Honestly, I will avoid this plane for at least 1, possible 2 years.