3 ms·
More OVH numbers using your same pgbenches. I've got a $99/mo GAM1 - Intel i7-7700K NO OC - 4C/8T - 4.2GHz - 64GB - NO SoftRAID (using ESXi) 2x450GB NVMe runnin
by blyat 8y ago
More OVH numbers using your same pgbenches. I've got a $99/mo GAM1 - Intel i7-7700K NO OC - 4C/8T - 4.2GHz - 64GB - NO SoftRAID (using ESXi) 2x450GB NVMe running 3 VMs. Two VMs are using < 50 MHz, the other is using 30% of the CPU for an empty Minecraft server.
With the Minecraft server on:
progress: 60.0 s, 6956.5 tps, lat 1.437 ms stddev 1.485
With the Minecraft server off:
progress: 60.0 s, 7275.5 tps, lat 1.374 ms stddev 1.975
Looks like not having SoftRaid is killing me. I wish I could test with it on so I can see the comparison of the E3 vs the 7700K, but I would need to re-image.
For fun, a random $5 lowest tier Digital Ocean droplet running a TeamSpeak server (which is using about .07% CPU):
progress: 60.0 s, 1507.3 tps, lat 6.631 ms stddev 5.809
And for even more fun, WSL running on my personal/WFH rig - i7-7820X @ 4.8GHz OC, 1TB 950 Pro NVME, 32GB RAM (I let this one run a bit longer as WSL has performance issues, was curious if I would see variance):
progress: 60.0 s, 1172.4 tps, lat 8.516 ms stddev 6.017
progress: 120.0 s, 1271.3 tps, lat 7.863 ms stddev 4.817
progress: 180.0 s, 1274.0 tps, lat 7.849 ms stddev 4.943
progress: 240.0 s, 1266.1 tps, lat 7.896 ms stddev 4.875
progress: 300.0 s, 1239.2 tps, lat 8.069 ms stddev 5.211
progress: 360.0 s, 1213.1 tps, lat 8.242 ms stddev 5.447
Ouch! A $3k rig gets outperformed by a $5 DO box.
- MuffinFlavored 8y agoVery weird. Can you test a more expensive DO box, please? I had to move to OVH from DO because the performance was so crap. My iMac was smoking the more expensive DO servers.
- blyat 8y agoTried the lowest CPU optimized and the 3rd highest for kicks: $40/mo - 4 GB Memory / 25 GB Disk / NYC1 - Ubuntu 18.04.2 x64 progress: 60.0 s, 3295.3 tps, lat 3.034 ms stddev 1.906 progress: 120.0 s, 3384.4 tps, lat 2.955 ms stddev 2.341 progress: 180.0 s, 3294.9 tps, lat 3.035 ms stddev 2.384 progress: 240.0 s, 3025.3 tps, lat 3.305 ms stddev 2.158 progress: 300.0 s, 3158.5 tps, lat 3.166 ms stddev 2.435 progress: 360.0 s, 3097.8 tps, lat 3.228 ms stddev 3.078 $480/mo - 64 GB Memory / 400 GB Disk / NYC3 - Ubuntu 18.04.2 x64 progress: 60.0 s, 4114.9 tps, lat 2.429 ms stddev 7.033 progress: 120.0 s, 4143.9 tps, lat 2.414 ms stddev 6.656 progress: 180.0 s, 3845.5 tps, lat 2.598 ms stddev 7.774 progress: 240.0 s, 4324.4 tps, lat 2.314 ms stddev 7.129 progress: 300.0 s, 3892.1 tps, lat 2.569 ms stddev 8.179 progress: 360.0 s, 4071.5 tps, lat 2.457 ms stddev 7.833 Doesn't look like they scale too well, unfortunately.
- MuffinFlavored 7y agoI'm surprised DO is killing it as hard as they are when OVH has dedicated servers for comparable prices and 2x the performance. Are you able to run pgbench against their new Postgres hosted instances?
- MuffinFlavored 7y agoI did it myself. $5 NYC1 droplet with pg-bench hitting a $480/mo NYC1 Postgres cluster: progress: 60.0 s, 2859.9 tps, lat 3.492 ms stddev 3.421 Yikes.