3 ms·
From memory, a few weeks ago it was upped to 500, I think. I'll see if I can find the item. ADDED IN EDIT: From http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529 h
by RiderOfGiraffes 16y ago
From memory, a few weeks ago it was upped to 500, I think. I'll see if I can find the item.
ADDED IN EDIT:
From http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529
> pg
> I've often thought of it. The reason I had downvotes
> originally was to deter people from saying things that
> were mean or stupid. But maybe the right way to deal
> with that is a separate mechanism from voting, as it
> is with stories. Maybe the right combo for comments is
> an uparrow, plus a flag link, and encourage users to
> flag comments that are mean or stupid.
>
> I'll think about the real solution more after I'm done
> reading applications, but I'll increase the downvote
> threshold to 500 now.
- timelinex 16y agoCould you cite the post for this?
- gdl 16y agohttp://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529
- RiderOfGiraffes 16y agoUm, didn't I do that already when I said: From http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529 http://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=1853529 Perhaps you meant something else ...
- timelinex 16y agoI was in before you edited your post.
- _grrr 16y agoThanks.