3 ms·
So true. This argument is simply bullshit in the US. It's just another justification for ridiculous hiring tests and other stupidity that weeds out a lot of goo
by mnm1 8y ago
So true. This argument is simply bullshit in the US. It's just another justification for ridiculous hiring tests and other stupidity that weeds out a lot of good candidates. You can hire someone today and fire them next week. It happens all the time and there isn't a high cost other than the compensation for a week. You can, although a really shitty move, even delay someone's benefits for a few weeks or even months while they go through a trial period, often known as probation. It's shitty, but if costs are that important, it can be easily done. If you can't tell if a candidate is good after a few weeks or months of them working with you, that is a problem with your company not the candidate.
- iaabtpbtpnn 8y agoI'm not taking a job that delays my benefits for any period, sorry, that's a deal breaker. I think most good candidates would feel the same way.