3 ms·
But we already do that with homes, so why not be consistent and do it with cars? Anyway, making walking and cycling as crappy as possible by giving people cong
by CalRobert 8y ago
But we already do that with homes, so why not be consistent and do it with cars?
Anyway, making walking and cycling as crappy as possible by giving people congested, polluted, dangerous streets is pretty inconsiderate to poor people as is.
And the article specifically mentions waivers for low income people.
- closeparen 8y agoCongestion makes cycling a little nicer, since the cars are slower and more predictable, and you’re the one zipping past them.
- CalRobert 8y agoI've cycled in lots of congested cities. This isn't completely wrong, but it's like going from one to two when we should aim for ten. But true, the _worst_ for cycling is very busy but still fast roads. Wilshire blvd on a Saturday comes to mind