3 ms·
His post explicitly mentions Java. Not at the time of my comment it didn't ;) Seeing as how some 99% of users run Flash, and 100% of Chrome users are guarante
by mootothemax 16y ago
His post explicitly mentions Java.
Not at the time of my comment it didn't ;)
Seeing as how some 99% of users run Flash, and 100% of Chrome users are guaranteed on the latest version... I find it hard to fault chrome/flash integration
Go back over the last 12 months - are you honestly trying to tell me that there were no ad networks serving ads containing Flash exploits? And that's only one area they appear.
Edit: I'm not ignoring Chrome's Flash integration, but you have to remember that was only released at the end of June: http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/ http://techcrunch.com/2010/06/25/google-chrome-flash/
- drivebyacct2 16y ago"Go back over the last 12 months - are you honestly trying to tell me that there were no ad networks serving ads containing Flash exploits? And that's only one area they appear." You're missing the point. Considering that nearly everyone has flash, most people don't update it, and Chrome forces you to always have the latest security patches (AND it can be disabled AND it can be click-to-enable plugin), they're protecting users, literally as much as possible. It's certainly better than the Firefox model which is what it's being compared to...
- drivebyacct2 16y agoHaha. This makes this humorous topic even funnier: http://www.techi.com/2010/12/one-small-step-for-flash-one-decently-sized-leap-for-chrome/ http://www.techi.com/2010/12/one-small-step-for-flash-one-de...