3 ms·
I 100% agree that the reputation system will be they key to scaling this. I'm currently seeing promise with my experiments with reputation scoring. As for "How
by YazIAm 8y ago
I 100% agree that the reputation system will be they key to scaling this. I'm currently seeing promise with my experiments with reputation scoring.
As for "How do you create a platform that allows correct ideas to flourish even when they go against conventional wisdom?" Great question, however my goal here is a bit more modest, it's to create a platform that allows facts which are provable by public primary sources to stand out from everything else. I think a platform that focuses on simply that can add a lot of value to political discourse.
- SamBam 8y agoThe bots would be a serious issue if this ever became big enough, since they can add to each other's reputation. Reddit probably has thousands of code-hours devoted to this, and bots are still a problem. There is also the problem that humans will probably tend to upvote "facts" that they agree with, and visa-versa. I'm not sure that reputation is the solution. And yet "expert" verification introduces trust. I'm not sure what the solution is.
- teleclimber 8y agoYes it's a super tough problem, not to be underestimated by anybody working on such a platform. If there is any easily automatable way gaining reputation, then the bots will use that, and if you can easily pass reputation too, then the rep system won't hold. > I'm not sure what the solution is. Ditto, and I've ben pondering this on and off for years :/