Is the primary idea for journalists to share the checks they did, or to have contributors help them check whether the things they mention are factual? The forme

Is the primary idea for journalists to share the checks they did, or to have contributors help them check whether the things they mention are factual? The former is what I'd imagine when I hear "open source fact checking", the latter would be called "crowd-sourced fact checking", I think. Just some feedback that might or might not be useful for your messaging, depending on your goals :)