The core DNA of agile was always adaption. But when your adaption consists of using your existing methodology with some agile concepts, but no retrospect on th

The core DNA of agile was always adaption. But when your adaption consists of using your existing methodology with some agile concepts, but no retrospect on the methodology itself, you're not agile by definition. What this "Agile Lite" puts right in the center is to split up your goals such that you can make meaningful work in a 3 week window, and track it asynchronously. Managers are free to have an overall plan for release in 12 months, as long as it's split up into units of work at most 1 day long. What I think I read from your comment is that if you couldn't get this to work in the "Old" agile, you will fail with this as well, and I agree.