4 ms·
I think he puts Twitter there because he doesn't use it. If you follow the right people it actually promotes intelligent discourse.
by aboutruby 8y ago
I think he puts Twitter there because he doesn't use it. If you follow the right people it actually promotes intelligent discourse.
- Lordarminius 8y agoSame with Instagram. I don't use it but I concede that it is useful to some people as a platform for promoting businesses. FB on the other hand, deserves to die in a fire.
- Stubb 8y agoI've all but dropped off Facebook but made an Instagram account earlier this year and am enjoying it. The photo-centric nature seems to eliminate 99% of the toxicity of Facebook. I've subscribed to the accounts of friends, architecture/design centers, Archillect, and accounts that post pictures of owls and otters. None of this promotes deep thinking or meaningful discussion, but it's a nice five-minute addition to my day. Plus it gives me a place to post my own photography where friends and others will see it. That said, I'm hardly a Facebook/Zuckerberg fan and will jump ship the moment another platform becomes viable.
- rchaud 8y agoIG is the same IMO. You won't see the blatant bigotry and politics, but you will see a monoculture of self-promoters and brand builders which are similarly exhausting, just in a different way. And I say this as someone who is subscribed to some niche meme pages on IG and enjoy them. It's just that if the page were to disappear tomorrow, I would have forgotten about it within a week. It wouldn't be missed. The value it gives me is very limited. I'd wager it's the same for a lot of other people. Social media's value is geared towards advertisers, not users.
- skilled 8y ago"Intelligent discourse" -- no need to be so generous with your choice of words.
- aboutruby 8y agoMaybe "meaningful" would be a better choice of word, not sure.
- lm28469 8y agoYou can find "intelligent discourse" everywhere on internet, even on 4chan/8chan and the like. The issue is signal/noise ratio. Instagram is particularly weird to me, look at what's trending, semi naked teenagers/stars, selfies and ads, that's all, for miles of scrolling. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-followed_Instagram_accounts https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_most-followed_Instagra... Guy Debord used "images" as a metaphor but with Instagram it's not even a metaphor anymore. > The spectacle is not a collection of images, but a social relation among people, mediated by images. > The celebrity, the spectacular representation of a living human being, embodies this banality by embodying the image of a possible role. Celebrities exist to act out various styles of living and viewing society unfettered .... They embody the inaccessible result of social labor by dramatizing its by-products magically projected above it as its goal: power and vacations, decision and consumption. > Where the real world changes into simple images, the simple images become real beings and effective motivations of hypnotic behavior. The spectacle [...] naturally finds vision to be the privileged human sense which the sense of touch was for other epochs; the most abstract, the most mystifiable sense corresponds to the generalized abstraction of present-day society. It is the opposite of dialogue.
- deleted 8y ago[deleted]