5 ms·
With such new evidence, how FAA which refused to ground the 737 Max should be allowed to walk away from all these for nothing?
by dis-sys 8y ago
With such new evidence, how FAA which refused to ground the 737 Max should be allowed to walk away from all these for nothing?
- jki275 8y agoThe FAA did ground the 737 Max.
- dis-sys 8y agoFAA defended 737 Max to the very last minute, FAA is nothing else but a cheap tool for big corporations like Boeing.
- jki275 8y agoThe last minute when they grounded them? I don't recall them "defending" anything, anyway, they simply held off grounding them until they got a little bit of data to back it up.
- dis-sys 8y ago> they simply held off grounding them until they got a little bit of data to back it up In my dictionary I have the following term which FAA and Boeing both actively ignored/violated. pre·cau·tion /prəˈkôSH(ə)n/ noun a measure taken in advance to prevent something dangerous, unpleasant, or inconvenient from happening.
- jki275 8y agoYou have to balance "precaution" with "knee-jerk".