4 ms·
Sure, but why not just set the amount at 5000+ people impacted? Why make it so people in some states are weighted more heavily than others?
by JauntTrooper 8y ago
Sure, but why not just set the amount at 5000+ people impacted? Why make it so people in some states are weighted more heavily than others?
- wcarron 8y agoI'm not Warren, but I would assume that the threshold scales so as not to stifle competition by creating very high barriers to entry. 5000 people isn't a lot per se, especially with the internet. Imposing very heavy handed regulation on budding small companies in the exact same we one would impose it on Wells Fargo, Google, or Amazon, just serves to entrench established businesses and push industries further towards oligopolies. Idk, just my $0.02