It isn’t right, indeed. The “standard of proof” and the “burden of proof” are different things. The burden of proof is about who must prove or what must be prov

It isn’t right, indeed. The “standard of proof” and the “burden of proof” are different things. The burden of proof is about who must prove or what must be proven; whereas the standard of proof is about how thorough that proof needs to be before we make a determination. A lot of the controversy about stuff like “sealioning” or when to act on claims of irregular behavior is due to failing to distinguish burden of proof and standard of proof.