3 ms·
You are getting a cut of it, in the form of the voluntary usage of a free service. That's voluntary barter, you're trading your data for usage of a service and
by ucaetano 8y ago
You are getting a cut of it, in the form of the voluntary usage of a free service. That's voluntary barter, you're trading your data for usage of a service and is perfectly fine.
If your point is "I want my cut in money", then you need to find someone who's willing to give you a cut in money.
> If I deny the use of my data (opt-out, right to be forgotten), I need a way to enforce that.
But that's easy to do: don't provide your data.
Your argument seems to be more like "bartering access for data should be illegal" or "it should be illegal to offer a free, ad-funded online service without offering the same service without any ads or tracking by the price that I want, a shrubbery, a nice one, not too expensive".
It isn't wrong, but it is a different argument.
PS: Sorry for the shrubbery joke, wasn't meant to ridicule anyone but myself :)
- specialist 8y ago"voluntary usage of a free service" Phone company sells my location data. My purchases are data minded. "don't provide your data" How would that work?
- ucaetano 7y ago> How would that work? Don't use Facebook. Phone companies use a constrained, public resource (spectrum). Facebook doesn't.