> or they're distributing so much content the rights-holders claim it distorted the market Sorry, I heard about the case years ago and don't have a link handy.

> or they're distributing so much content the rights-holders claim it distorted the market Sorry, I heard about the case years ago and don't have a link handy. However, that point by itself would be enough to undermine the original claim that only for-profit distribution is considered criminal.