3 ms·
Certainly it's possible that the many sources - there were more than a dozen if the reporters are to be believed - were lying. Wouldn't it be fairer to hold th
by howard941 8y ago
Certainly it's possible that the many sources - there were more than a dozen if the reporters are to be believed - were lying. Wouldn't it be fairer to hold that the jury's still out? There's this https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomberg/?page=3 https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/10/04/supermicro_bloomber... documenting an attack ("...how the attack played out at Elemental...") . At that same page is a reasonable quote of advice from SANS' director. And another take here https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2018/10/05/making-sense-of-the-supermicro-motherboard-attack/ https://www.lightbluetouchpaper.org/2018/10/05/making-sense-...
- wybiral 8y agoI'm not ruling out that what they reported (or something resembling what they reported) happened. But it's been half a year and no evidence or corroboration has surfaced. That just seems odd.