4 ms·

This is cool and I could see myself using this, but I wonder why it's necessary to `import cog` in the examples? Seems like it'd be better to just include cog i

by gh02t 8y ago

This is cool and I could see myself using this, but I wonder why it's necessary to `import cog` in the examples? Seems like it'd be better to just include cog implicitly in the namespace by design for these snippets since you're practically always going to use it.

philipov 8y ago
Explicit is better than implicit. Automatically importing it makes the code look like magic.
- nedbat 8y ago
  As it happens, "cog" is also implicitly imported, though tbh I forget why....!
  - gh02t 8y ago
    Awesome, that makes a lot more sense to me. I'm a long-time fan and reader, keep up the great work!