3 ms·
I've personally lost that much twice. The second time was due to illness while traveling, but the first time was when returning to serious distance running tra
by xiaoma 16y ago
I've personally lost that much twice. The second time was due to illness while traveling, but the first time was when returning to serious distance running training after a multi-year layoff. Not only did I lost 20lbs in a month, it was a total of 55 lbs over three months. I went from struggling to do an easy one hour run to running over 150km/week.
I'm almost positive your math is off on the calorie burning. As an overweight guy, you should be burning over a 100 calories per km, not mile. Also, there's more to it than just what you burn while running. After a certain tipping point (about an hour a day for me), it seems my body just doesn't want to store fat. I'm not sure if it was a factor, but like most successful distance runners, I stuck to a low-protein mostly plant-based diet while training.
The other factor to consider is that someone approaching running from being a sedentary programmer (as opposed to a bodybuilder), you'll be building up muscle and even some bone mass as well as losing the fat. This is the case for pretty much any weight-bearing activity (eg, skiing, snowshoeing, etc)
- jessriedel 16y ago> I went from struggling to do an easy one hour run to running over 150km/week. I think 150km/week qualifies as pretty strenuous! I'm not saying one can't lose 20 lbs. / month, I'm saying it doesn't happen by just eating healthier, smaller meals. > you should be burning over a 100 calories per km, not mile. Well, 125 cal / mile = 78 cal / km, so we're not off by much. Certainly, there will be that much variance depending on whether you're (a) healthy but not lean or (b) fairly overweight