4 ms·
Fair point, I stand corrected then: let's consider beating a boy because he is fat?
by AlexTWithBeard 8y ago
Fair point, I stand corrected then: let's consider beating a boy because he is fat?
- Miner49er 8y agoI should've also pointed out there is also obviously a huge difference between not going to see a movie someone made and beating someone. Also, it's still out of the kid's control, depending on age (parents supply the food) so it's not a great example.
- AlexTWithBeard 8y agoDepending on circumstances, boycotting a person and running his (or her) career may cause more suffering than beating. While these two situations are different, they have a lot in common: - the casus belli often has nothing to do with the bully. Being fat is my problem (unless you sit next to me in the airplane). Me cheating my wife is between two of us. None of that should be anyone's business - the purpose of both actions is hurting the individual, not correcting the behavior. Being beaten is an awful way to lose weight. - both actions are collective. Those trying to confront the bully are risking to become the next victim.
- renox 8y agoIn France there's a famous singer who beat a woman to death, by the same logic this is private business between him, the justice and the woman's family? I say no: at some point I don't want to be 'entertained' by someone I despise, even if I understand that this also impacts the rest of the band..
- AlexTWithBeard 8y agoThe key difference is: if you don't want to listen to this guy's songs because you don't like him, that's perfectly fine. But if you start a public campaign to boycott his concerts in order to punish him further, that is akin to bullying.